This sounds like it has been taken from a star trek episode.
Imagine a black hole somewhere in space. We know that this “singularity” creates a void in which gravity is so intense that it absorbs everything even light and time itself. But where does it go to? Our physic and chemical models insist that something simply cannot dissapear yet it can be transformed into another substance or that it changes its state burn wood -> ash + smoke. Ice = solid water …
So this black hole starts absorbing things and suddenly it ceases to exist.
Did the black hole eat to much? Or was the amount absorbed equal to its gravity void thus filling the hole.
Ok, theories enough but imagine this:
- The black hole functions as some sort of highway to another part of the galaxy (hyperspace, whatever)
- The black hole functions as some sort of gateway through time
This second part is quite interesting. The black hole absorbs time and light this means it is not being subject to these thus it can change them.
A black hole being opened can maybe open at the exact same position in the future or in the past making timetravel possible.
A good example of this timetravel is the LHC at cern. For some time now we are trying to make it collide particles into each other to discover new unique particles which can tell us about our past (source) .
The LHC is still out of business due to constant breakdowns or political decisions.
One theory that tries to explain this is “self-preservation”. Special higgs particles who are yet purely theoretical, (come back through time to) sabotage the LHC to make sure they are never discovered.
Maybe these particles make timetravel possible. Maybe they hold the key to anti-matter. So many theories, so little answers.
The movie “déjà vu” talks about timetravel by manipulating particles (higgs particles?).
Denzel goes back into time to stop an event from happening … but …
- Bomb explodes, people die
- Denzel goes back into time to stop the terrorist
- He succeeds, the event does not happen
Now if the bomb explosion did not happen, then there is no reason for Denzel to go back into time meaning he did not have to go back in time in the future.
Wait … what?
And what about this:
- Bomb explodes, people die
- Denzel goes back into time to stop the terrorist
- He succeeds, the event does not happen
- He wants to go back to his own time but he cant since the bomb did not explode => no reason for him to go back into time => he does not exist in the future => trapped in the past
Quite hard to imagine that timetravel is actually possible although according to Holger Bech Nielsen and Masao Ninomiya it is quite possible.
I don’t know, but it sure it fascinating to think about it.
Ge vergeet wel een aantal basis principes van de quantum mechanica ….
Tijd is RELATIEF … wat betekent dat dit eigenlijk niet bestaat.
volgens onze 3 dimensionale berekeningen moeten we tijd gebruiken als maatstaf…
Terwijl is een bijvoorbeeld 10 dimensionale wereld tijd maar een fractie uitmaakt van van de wereld.
Daardoor lijkt het voor ons onbegrijpbaar dat een zwart gat “tijd” opslorpt…
terwijl in een … moet da dus zijn
Time is considered the fourth dimension Pan. Time is relative idd, but that does not mean it does not exist.
Dus, volgens de quantum mechanica kan de exacte staat van een deeltje niet gespecifieerd worden (plaats & snelheid) ergo het moet mogelijk zijn om door de tijd te reizen. Dus op wat slaat u comment Pan?
ja natuurlijk kan een deeltje niet vastgelegd worden zonder tijd en plaats….
maar je kan geen deeltje vastleggen met beide …
je kan alleen maar accepteren of gissen naar het deeltje …
of wel is de tijd exact ofwel is de plaats exact …
Maar noooooit beide …
ja dat zeg ik toch. Je verwacht toch niet dat ik hier heel de quantum mechanica – fysica uit de doeken moet doen he
Een beetje eigen opzoekingswerk is aan te raden.